The End of Porn

The "enter netshould have finally allowed worldwide communications for all of humanity. The development of worldwide wire communications should have led to cures for cancer and development of an unlimited but clean power source. The honorable development of the wire medium was made impossible by an immoral, aging SCOTUS failing to recognize the "enter net" as nothing but computers replacing telegraph and fax machines connected to interconnected WIRES. See the Reno v ACLU mistake create an immaginary new medium despite the OBVIOUS fact that NO wHOLY NEW MEDIUM WILL EVER EXIST.

The culturally senile and immoral United States' Courts are why the attractive nuisance of unregulated "free speech" disguised as "enter-net" exists and continues today because of an elderly oligarchy addicted to anonymous access to free porn on the "porn-er-net".

Can true judicial morality be expected with roughly 
103-civil cases and roughly 66-criminal cases for about 167 total cases for Honorable TLB out of around total 893 cases opened in 2014 for theWestern District of Arkansas? Not likely. Over four federal civil cases per week for Honorable TLB to consider with over one additional federal crime to consider each week. Curtis J Neeley Jr contends this case-load is absurd. Honorable TLB is NOT culturally senile but is surrounded by cultural senility in the Judicial Branch as a whole.

  1. Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al, (5:14-cv-5135)
    | Pending dishonorable dismissal since 5/27/2014 after Show Cause hearing before Honorable TLB.
    This biting but respectful BRIEF SHOULD result in this complaint being allowed for an AR jury.  
    HOWEVER; This Partial Summary Judgment Motion with biting Support Brief should result in
    the complete end of unauthorized display of indecency to the anonymous!
    GOOG will soon cease profitability based on porn traffic.

  2. Neeley v Federal Communications Commissioners, et al, (5:13-cv-5293)
    | Legal mistake by immoral, angry, culturally-senile, porn-protecting Jimm Larry Hendren.

  3. Neeley v FCC, et al, (5:13-mc-00066)
    | Legal mistake by immoral, angry, culturally-senile, porn-protecting Jimm Larry Hendren. 

  4. Neeley Jr v FCC, et al, (5:12-cv-5208) (13-1506)(13-6502)
    | Legal mistake by pro se plaintiff and immoral, angry, culturally-senile, porn-protecting Jimm Larry Hendren
  5. Neeley v NameMedia Inc et al, (5:12-cv-5074)
    |  Legal mistake by pro se plaintiff

  6. Neeley v NameMedia Inc et al, (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558
    | Immoral decision by immoral, angry, senile, porn-protecting Jimm Larry Hendren.
    The only consideration for moral copy[rites] for photography in history!
    Moral rights ruled not to protect for unauthorized use of embarrassing photo art "online".